- Age Discrimination
- Americans With Disabilities Act
- Class Actions
- Disparate Impact
- EEOC Regulations
- Employee Benefits
- Family Medical Leave Act
- Independent Contractors
- Labor Law
- Michigan Employment Issues
- National Labor Relations Act
- Noncompete Agreements
- Religion In The Workplace
- Right To Work
- State Employment Regulation
- Trade Secrets
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Wage and Hour
- New FLSA Regulations Enjoined!
- One Down, One to Go: Courts Weigh In on Enjoining DOL Persuader and FLSA Exemption Rules
- Follow Up: EEOC Releases Revised EEO-1 Form Which Now Tracks Employee Pay Data
- An Employer’s Pocket Survival Guide to the New Overtime Regulations
- States Hopping on the Department of Labor’s Misclassification Bandwagon
- NLRB Continues to Make Non-Union Employers Nervous
- Making It Count—When Employer Harassment Policies Make the Difference
- Chicago City Council Passes Mandatory Paid Sick Leave Ordinance – What Employers Need to Know
- The New Overtime Regulations Are Now Official
- New Federal Defense of Trade Secrets Act Requires Employers to Re-Examine Employee Confidentiality Agreements
Showing 7 posts in Immigration.
Following the US Supreme Court ruling the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally denies federal benefits to married same-sex couples on June 26, 2013, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano issued the following statement:
I applaud today’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor holding that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. This discriminatory law denied thousands of legally married same-sex couples many important federal benefits, including immigration benefits. I am pleased the Court agreed with the Administration’s position that DOMA’s restrictions violate the Constitution. Working with our federal partners, including the Department of Justice, we will implement today's decision so that all married couples will be treated equally and fairly in the administration of our immigration laws.
Since this does not specifically state same-sex married couples can now obtain immigration benefits, a more formal policy statement is expected on this subject in the future.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will require US employers to use its revised Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9 beginning on May 7, 2013.
All employers are required to complete a Form I-9 for each employee hired in the United States. The updated form includes new information fields. In addition, the USCIS has stated it also has new formatting to reduce errors and clearer instructions for both employees and employers.
Employers may continue to use previously approved versions until May 7, 2013. After that date, they are required to only use the Form I-9 with a revision date of. 03/08/13. These revision dates are printed on the lower left corner of the form. Employers are not required to complete the new Form I-9 for current employees if they have a properly completed form on file already.
A Spanish-language version of the new form is also available on the USCIS website for use in Puerto Rico only. Spanish-speaking employers and employees in the 50 states, Washington, D.C., and other U.S. territories can refer to the Spanish version but must complete the English-language version of the form.
The new Form I-9 is available in English and Spanish online at http://www.uscis.gov.
The Risk of Voting In A Presidential Election If You’re Not a U.S. Citizen—A Timely Reminder From The Seventh Circuit
With Election Day approaching and the lengthy presidential campaign coming to an end, it is easy to conclude that any person in this country who can vote should do so. However, noncitizens risk harsh consequences if they vote or even register to vote in a federal election. The Seventh Circuit provided a timely reminder in two decisions that only U.S. citizens may legally vote in the upcoming presidential election. Noncitizens who vote may jeopardize the future they sought in the country for themselves and their families, and dash the plans of employers that want them to work here. Read More ›
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Service has announced that, until further notice, employers should continue using the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, that is currently available although the form indicates its validity expired on August 31, 2012. The USCIS is in the process of updating the Form I-9, and will provide updated information about the new version as it becomes available.
The newest version of the Form I-9 was proposed through a notice in the Federal Register on March 27, 2012, and was due to become effective on August 31,2012. However, the USCIS has indicated it would allow an additional 30 days of comments on the new form. Accordingly, it will go into effect on September 21, 2012.
The federal government has continued its campaign of prosecuting employers of illegal aliens. Herbco International, Inc. and three top executives pleaded guilty to felony offenses and were sentenced to a fine of $1 million and five years' probation for harboring, concealing, shielding an illegal alien, and encouraging and inducing an illegal alien to reside in the United States. Read More ›
The need for businesses to be proactive in their review of employee immigration status recently was highlighted by the serious penalties levied upon the owners of a California restaurant. Marino Sandoval and his wife Nicole Sandoval, owners of El Balazo Restaurant, in Oakland, California, were sentenced on April 24, 2012, after pleading guilty to various immigration, Social Security and tax violations. Read More ›
The United States Supreme Court seemed to sympathize with the State of Arizona during oral arguments on its immigration enforcement statute on April 25, 2012.The law, passed in 2010, allows police officers to check the immigration status of people they suspect of being present in the US illegally and for their arrest if they are confirmed to lack legal status.The Justice Department sued Arizona to enjoin enforcement of the law, arguing the state does not have the authority to allow such checks and the arrest of suspected illegal aliens without a warrant. Read More ›