Topics
- Age Discrimination
- Americans With Disabilities Act
- Arbitration
- Class Actions
- Discrimination
- Disparate Impact
- EEOC Regulations
- Employee Benefits
- Family Medical Leave Act
- Harassment
- Immigration
- Independent Contractors
- Labor Law
- Michigan Employment Issues
- National Labor Relations Act
- Noncompete Agreements
- OFCCP
- Privacy
- Religion In The Workplace
- Retaliation
- Right To Work
- State Employment Regulation
- Trade Secrets
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Wage and Hour
- Whistleblower
Contributors
Recent Posts
- Whistle While You Work: Congress Strengthens Protections for Employees Reporting Antitrust Violations
- California Employment Law Alert: New Employment Laws Effective On or Before January 1, 2021
- EEOC Issues Technical Assistance Regarding Vaccination and Anti-Discrimination Laws
- The CDC’s New Definition of “Close Contact”: What You Need To Know
- Election Day Obligations: What Employers Need to Know
- Michigan Employers and Employees Enjoy New Protections After Governor Whitmer Signs New Laws
- Michigan Issues Emergency COVID-19 Workplace Safety Rules With Immediate Effect
- California Expands Workplace Protections Related to COVID-19 by Enacting Two Statutes Regarding Notice Requirements and Workers’ Compensation Coverage
- To Be or Not to Be (An Independent Contractor): DOL Seeks to Clarify Independent Contractor Test in Landmark Proposed Rule
- 10 Things You Should Know About the EEOC’s COVID-19 Guidance
The Dominos Have Begun To Fall: Statutory Protection for Facebook Passwords
In March, the revelation that the Maryland Department of Corrections was requiring prospective employees to provide their Facebook passwords during their interviews touched off a firestorm of controversy in the press. In response, senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Charles Schumer (D-NY) asked the Department of Justice and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to determine whether the practice violated any current federal laws, with the intent of introducing legislation to make it illegal, if it is not already.
State governments moved more quickly and last week, Maryland became the first state to sign into law a prohibition against employers requiring applicants to provide access to social media accounts as a condition of employment. Many other states, including Illinois, California, Minnesota, Michigan, New Yorkand Massachusetts, have similar bills pending. The federal government followed suit last week, when Reps. Elliot Engel (D-NY) and Jan Schakowski (D-IL) introduced the Social Networking Online Protection Act, which, if it becomes law, would prohibit current or former employers from demanding a username or password to a social networking account. Violations of the proposed federal law would subject an employer to a $10,000 civil penalty.
While it is questionable how widespread this practice is (and its advisability for employers is certainly debatable), employers need to keep current on the laws in each state in which they have operations to ensure that they are complying with current legal standards.