Topics
- Age Discrimination
- Americans With Disabilities Act
- Arbitration
- Class Actions
- Discrimination
- Disparate Impact
- EEOC Regulations
- Employee Benefits
- Family Medical Leave Act
- Harassment
- Immigration
- Independent Contractors
- Labor Law
- Michigan Employment Issues
- National Labor Relations Act
- Noncompete Agreements
- OFCCP
- Privacy
- Religion In The Workplace
- Retaliation
- Right To Work
- State Employment Regulation
- Trade Secrets
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Wage and Hour
- Whistleblower
Contributors
Recent Posts
- Not So Fast – Court of Appeals Invalidates Shortened Limitations Period in Employee Handbook
- Department of Labor Announces Final Rule Changing Salary Level Tests
- Sixth Circuit Provides Important Employer Guidance in Combating FMLA Abuse
- AB 5 Is Making Waves in California by Changing the Way Businesses Classify Workers
- Chicago Adopts “Fair Work Week Ordinance”
- Lawsuit Filed to Stop August 1 Effective Date of San Antonio Paid Sick Leave Ordinance
- Justices Highlight Importance Of Title VII Procedural Details
- Help Wanted in Michigan? Only Those 21 Years and Up Need Apply
- Freedom to Gig: New Department of Labor Opinion Bolsters Employers’ Ability to Classify “Virtual Workers” as Independent Contractors
- The Michigan Saga Continues: The Constitutional Validity of the New Michigan Paid Medical Leave Act and New Minimum Wage Law Heads to the Michigan Supreme Court
Showing 1 post by Allison M. Scott.
AB 5 Is Making Waves in California by Changing the Way Businesses Classify Workers
AB 5 is making waves in California by changing the way companies will classify workers. AB 5 codifies the ABC test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.4th 903 (“Dynamex”). In Dynamex, the Court held that for violations of California’s wage orders, a worker is presumed to be an employee, unless the business proves the following: Read More ›