Topics
- Age Discrimination
- Americans With Disabilities Act
- Arbitration
- Class Actions
- Discrimination
- Disparate Impact
- EEOC Regulations
- Employee Benefits
- Family Medical Leave Act
- Harassment
- Immigration
- Independent Contractors
- Labor Law
- Michigan Employment Issues
- National Labor Relations Act
- Noncompete Agreements
- OFCCP
- Privacy
- Religion In The Workplace
- Retaliation
- Right To Work
- State Employment Regulation
- Trade Secrets
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Wage and Hour
- Whistleblower
Contributors
Recent Posts
- Higher Learning: Employees of Educational Institutions Likely Protected From Sexual Orientation Discrimination under Title IX
- Face/Off: The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act Spawns a Wave of Class Action Lawsuits
- The Supreme Court Gives Employers the Green Light, Will No Longer Narrowly Construe FLSA Exemptions
- Silence Just Became More Expensive: Trump Tax Reform Requires Employers to Choose Between Tax Deduction and Confidentiality of #MeToo Settlements
- Employers Face Risks Despite State Sexual Harassment Allegations in the Post-Weinstein Era, Placing Higher Emphasis on Internal Investigations
- The DOL’s Wage & Hour Division “Dusts-Off” Shelved Opinion Letters
- U.S. Department of Labor Revision of Intern Test Provides Clarity to Employers
- The New NLRB Takes Major Swings at "Obama Board" Initiatives
- A Michigan Employer Avoids Sexual Harassment Liability Through Proper Investigation and Employee Discipline
- Listen Closely, Managers Need Training on Family and Medical Leave Act Procedures
Showing 3 posts by Daniel R. Stern.
Listen Closely, Managers Need Training on Family and Medical Leave Act Procedures
It is well known that the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) is a nuanced law with many technical steps and requirements within the governing regulations. One of the most complex issues is knowing when an absence may be or is FMLA-qualifying, and how to respond. This is a difficult determination for one who has worked with the FMLA and received training on the issue. It is an even more perplexing determination for many managers who have no idea that an employee may be eligible for FMLA leave based on a phone call notifying the company of an absence—whether that absence is for a few or several days.
The case of Boadi v. Center of Human Development, Inc. and Candy Pennington illustrates the consequences of a manager’s failure to properly respond to a potentially FMLA-qualifying event, and demonstrates the importance of training a company’s front-line managers on how to handle these situations. Read More ›
Wake Up Federal Contractors; Key Affirmative Action Issues for 2016
Although the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) has not been as active as the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) in updating regulations and issuing harsh decisions, unprepared federal contractors or subcontractors may face significant problems with the OFCCP during 2016. Read More ›
Diversity Guidance for Banks: A Light Hand!
The long awaited interagency policy statement of diversity policies and practices for banks (and other entities regulated by the federal banking regulators) has been issued. There were more than 200 comments on the October 25, 2013, proposal that assisted the agencies in achieving clarity in the final statement.
Here are some of the big picture take-aways from the statement: Read More ›