Dykema Labor & Employment Law Blog
Posts in Privacy
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on TwitterTopics
- Age Discrimination
- Americans With Disabilities Act
- Arbitration
- Class Actions
- Discrimination
- Disparate Impact
- EEOC Regulations
- Employee Benefits
- Family Medical Leave Act
- Harassment
- Immigration
- Independent Contractors
- Labor Law
- Michigan Employment Issues
- National Labor Relations Act
- Noncompete Agreements
- OFCCP
- Privacy
- Religion In The Workplace
- Retaliation
- Right To Work
- State Employment Regulation
- Trade Secrets
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Wage and Hour
- Whistleblower
Contributors
Recent Posts
- Hidden in the American Rescue Plan Act: More Reasons for Employees To Take FFCRA Leave and More Time for Employers To Receive Tax Credits
- Change is Near: What the Biden Executive Order Means for Title IX Misconduct Claims
- What Does Governor Abbott’s “Reopening Texas” Executive Order Mean For Texas Employers?
- Is Wi-Fi Sickness a Disability? California Appellate Court Holds That It Is Under FEHA
- Whistle While You Work: Congress Strengthens Protections for Employees Reporting Antitrust Violations
- California Employment Law Alert: New Employment Laws Effective On or Before January 1, 2021
- EEOC Issues Technical Assistance Regarding Vaccination and Anti-Discrimination Laws
- The CDC’s New Definition of “Close Contact”: What You Need To Know
- Election Day Obligations: What Employers Need to Know
- Michigan Employers and Employees Enjoy New Protections After Governor Whitmer Signs New Laws
Showing 1 post in Privacy.
The Dominos Have Begun To Fall: Statutory Protection for Facebook Passwords
In March, the revelation that the Maryland Department of Corrections was requiring prospective employees to provide their Facebook passwords during their interviews touched off a firestorm of controversy in the press. In response, senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Charles Schumer (D-NY) asked the Department of Justice and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to determine whether the practice violated any current federal laws, with the intent of introducing legislation to make it illegal, if it is not already. Read More ›