Dykema Labor & Employment Law Blog
Posts in National Labor Relations Act
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on TwitterTopics
- Age Discrimination
- Americans With Disabilities Act
- Arbitration
- Class Actions
- Discrimination
- Disparate Impact
- EEOC Regulations
- Employee Benefits
- Family Medical Leave Act
- Harassment
- Immigration
- Independent Contractors
- Labor Law
- Michigan Employment Issues
- National Labor Relations Act
- Noncompete Agreements
- OFCCP
- Privacy
- Religion In The Workplace
- Retaliation
- Right To Work
- State Employment Regulation
- Trade Secrets
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Wage and Hour
- Whistleblower
Contributors
Recent Posts
- USCIS To Resume Premium Processing
- USCIS Proposes 10% Surcharge on Filing Fees
- Results of Dykema’s 2020 COVID-19 Employer Survey
- Bringing Employees Back to Work Post-COVID-19: What Is Michigan’s Work Share Program and Should Employers Take Advantage of It?
- Paycheck Protection Program Loan Forgiveness Not Impacted by Employees Who Won’t Return to Work, If Properly Documented
- New Version of I-9 Required as of May 1, 2020
- DOL Issues More FFCRA Compliance Guidance on Paid Leaves
- President Trump Issues Proclamation Barring Intending Immigrants From U.S. for 60 Days
- Employers Beware: COVID-19 Will Not Excuse Wage or Labor Fixing Agreements
- Ironing out the Details: The Department of Labor Updates and Adds to Its FFCRA Guidance Faqs
Showing 2 posts in National Labor Relations Act.
NLRB Continues to Make Non-Union Employers Nervous
Last month, the National Labor Relations Board issued two more significant decisions reminding employers – unionized and non-unionized alike – that they may indirectly be subject to the National Labor Relations Act in ways previously unrealized. They did so by making it more difficult for employers using contracted staff or buying the assets of unionized employers to avoid either an obligation to bargain with unions representing the staffing company or predecessor’s employees, or even being locked into the terms unions may have had with those employers upon buying the assets of another employer. Read More ›
Employers Beware: Employees May Disparage You Without Risking Their Jobs
On March 25, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a finding by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) that Jimmy John’s sandwich makers were wrongfully terminated after posting hundreds of signs insinuating that the sandwiches they make could make customers sick. According to the NLRB and the court, those employees were engaging in concerted activities protected under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). MikLin Enterprises v. NLRB, Case No. 14-3099 (8th Cir. Mar. 25, 2016). Read More ›