National Labor Relations Board

Subscribe to National Labor Relations Board via RSS

Takeaways

  • President Trump issued a record-breaking number of executive orders in his first 100 days, many of which significantly impact labor and employment law.
  • New DEI-related executive orders require employers—particularly federal contractors—to certify compliance with anti-discrimination laws and may trigger increased scrutiny of hiring practices.
  • Federal agencies are moving away from the “disparate impact” theory of liability, signaling potential shifts in how employment discrimination cases are litigated and defended.
  • Leadership changes at the EEOC and NLRB have left both agencies without quorums, limiting their ability to enact new rules or pursue major litigation.

On November 5, 2024, President Donald J. Trump achieved something that many did not think possible when he was elected to a second, non-consecutive term to be the President of the United States. In his campaign, President Trump promised to reshape the federal government and aggressively influence and change many areas of law with executive action. Subsequently, President Trump has issued a flurry of executive orders (“EOs”) that cover a multitude of legal, administrative, and other areas of law. One area in which the EOs have had a direct impact is in the labor and employment field.

Since President Trump took his second oath of office, he signed and implemented more than 140 EOs in the first 100 days of his presidency—a number that eclipses all previous records, including former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s record of 99 EOs in the first 100 days set in 1933. Many of President Trump’s EOs are still in effect, while other of these second-term EOs are facing numerous challenges in the U.S. federal court system.

Below is a summary of the most impactful EOs issued during President Trump’s first 100 days in office related to labor and employment law, along with a brief analysis on how they may impact private employers, companies, and individual workers in the employment sphere. All private employers and their human resource teams should familiarize themselves with these changes to ensure compliance with applicable federal laws, in addition to any additional U.S. local or state laws.Continue Reading The First 100 Days of President Trump’s Second Presidency: Re-Shaping Federal Employment Policies

Over the last two years, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has been aggressively trying to expand its coverage in a manner that has taken many employers of non-unionized employees by surprise. Many rules and concepts that have been in place for decades without challenge have been turned on their heads and are now construed to be illegal. One example is a decision by the NLRB earlier this year in McLaren Macomb ruling that common confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in settlement and separation agreements are illegal, as a matter of law, because they could – at least theoretically – chill a worker’s right to engage in concerted activity  protected under  the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). The takeaway from these actions by the NLRB and its General Counsel is that all policies and practices of every employer – unionized and non-unionized – will be scrutinized under the NLRB’s new highly powered microscope. In other words, employers watch out!Continue Reading Employee Handbooks: The Pendulum Swings Back Questioning the Legality of Many Common Policies

In a case decided by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) on February 23, 2023, provisions in separation and settlement agreements regarding non-disparagement and confidentiality may run afoul of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or “Act”). On March 22, 2023, in an effort to provide guidance as to the scope and impact of the decision, the NLRB’s General Counsel issued a Guidance for how its regional offices should evaluate these agreements going forward. The Guidance suggests that the decision has even broader ramifications than initially thought. As described below, the decision along with the Guidance should cause employers to pause before inserting many commonly used provisions in these types of agreements.Continue Reading Non-Union and Union Employers Beware: Basic Provisions in Separation and Settlement Agreements Are Now Illegal

As employee complaints about safety and the availability of personal protection equipment (“PPE”) mount, employers should remember that the law protects employees engaged in concerted action. Specifically, the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) protects the right of employees “to engage in… concerted activities for the purpose of… mutual aid or protection.” These protections apply to both unionized and non-unionized employees.
Continue Reading A Timely Reminder: Employee Complaints About Working Conditions Are Protected